Today’s post is sponsored by DeleteMe. A Trump Account may not be the best move for your kid, but there’s something else you can do TODAY that will help protect them. As you may know, data brokers can legally collect and sell all types of information about you – things like your name, your kids’ names, your address, your phone number. This exposes you to a whole host of risks including phishing attempts, harassment, and doxxing.
DeleteMe helps remove your information from hundreds of data broker and people search websites – reducing the risk that your information winds up in the wrong hands (and saving you loads of time!). They’ve been the leading expect in removing Personally Identifiable Information for over 15 years and my friends over at the New York Times have recently named them the #1 data-removal service.
I especially like the fact that they use their own tech to continuously monitor and remove your data. That means they’re keeping your data safe by not outsourcing to a third party – which is kind of the whole point. Use this link or go to joindeleteme.com/wolfers and use the code WOLFERS to get 20% off a DeleteMe consumer plan today.
In this episode of The Professor Is In, I answer your questions and respond to comments from my latest video dispelling the hype around Trump Accounts. I argued that Trump accounts are really two policies bundled together. There’s the attention-grabbing $1,000 payment for newborns, which has a genuine “kernel of genius” if the goal is to introduce families to saving, investing, and compound interest. But that piece is temporary. The larger, more durable part is a tax-advantaged wealth-transfer tool that primarily helps upper-middle-class families pass assets to their children.
I connect these accounts to other temporary Trump-era tax promises — on tips, overtime, and Social Security — and contrasts those short-lived populist gestures with more permanent tax cuts for the rich. The result is a style of fiscal policy that looks pro-worker on the surface while delivering much larger long-run gains elsewhere.
I also explain why complexity is not just annoying — but economically harmful. When benefits are routed through a maze of tax rules, account types, and employer provisions, take-up falls. And those most likely to miss out are often the families who can least afford to, making an already regressive system even more unequal.
